BMW X4 vs Volkswagen T-Roc

BMW X4
BMW’s coupé-SUV (Sports Activity Coupé).

Volkswagen T-Roc
Volkswagen’s compact crossover SUV.
BMW X4
Pick the X4 for a more aggressively styled coupé-SUV with xDrive and strong inline-six engines — trading practical space versus the X3.
Volkswagen T-Roc
Pick the T-Roc for a bold crossover look with an elevated seat and city-friendly dimensions.
Performance
M40i · Petrol vs 1.5 TSI 150 · Petrol
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
360 hp
Winner
|
150 hp
|
| Torque |
500 Nm
Winner
|
250 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
4,8 s
Winner
|
8,5 s
|
| Top speed |
250 km/h
Winner
|
205 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
188,0 hp/t
Winner
|
118,6 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
191 g/km
|
128 g/km
Winner
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
8,2 L/100km
|
5,6 L/100km
Winner
|
Dimensions & space
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
525 L
Winner
|
445 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.430 L
Winner
|
1.290 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,86 m
Winner
|
2,59 m
|
| Length |
4,75 m
|
4,23 m
|
| Width |
1,92 m
|
1,82 m
|
| Height |
1,62 m
|
1,57 m
|
| Seats |
5
|
5
|
Powertrain & tech
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | F25 (F26) · CLAR (G02) | MQB A1 (transverse, shared with the Audi Q2) |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive · All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | N20/N55 · B48/B58 petrol · N47/B47 · B57 diesel | EA211/EA211 Evo petrol · EA888 petrol · EA288 diesel |
| Fuel | Petrol · Diesel | Petrol · Diesel |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic (ZF) | 6-speed manual · 7-speed DSG |
| Euro standard | Euro 6 | Euro 6 (early) · Euro 6d (later) |
| LEZ access | Euro 6 petrol/diesel allowed in the LEZ (Brussels/Antwerp/Ghent) | Euro 6 petrol/diesel allowed in the LEZ (Brussels/Antwerp/Ghent) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- N20 timing chain and tensioner (early F26)
- Oil-filter housing and valve-cover leaks
- EGR cooler recall (B47/B57 diesel)
- DSG shift quality or fluid-service neglect
- 1.5 TSI cold-start hesitation/"kangarooing" (early)
- AdBlue/DPF on diesels (short trips)
Pros
- Aggressive coupé-SUV styling with presence
- Planted xDrive all-wheel drive
- Strong inline-six engines (B58/B57)
- Elevated seating and a usable boot
- Agile and compact in town
- Wide, efficient TSI/TDI range
Cons
- Sloping roof costs headroom and load volume versus the X3
- Firm ride, especially on M Sport adaptive suspension
- Smaller boot on 4MOTION versions (~392 l)
- Harder interior plastics
Driving experience
BMW X4
More dynamic and refined than the F26. Steering is accurate and well-weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but prioritises composure and refinement over pure sharpness. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) offers a useful range between firm and acceptable comfort. The B58 M40i is the standout: strong, refined, free-revving and characterful with excellent mid-range punch. B48 four-cylinder petrols are smooth and responsive. Diesels (especially the B57 sixes) deliver strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that balances road presence, dynamics and everyday usability better than its predecessor.
Volkswagen T-Roc
Easy, comfortable and a little more involving than most crossovers. The T-Roc steers accurately with decent weighting, rides well enough, and handles tidily for a car of its height, with the 2.0 TSI R version adding genuine pace. Front-drive is the default; 4MOTION adds traction in poor conditions. The 1.5 TSI is the sensible pick — smooth and efficient — the 2.0 TDI is the distance choice, and the 1.0 TSI is adequate for town work. The DSG is smooth; the manual is light. It is a well-rounded compact crossover that feels closer to a Golf than its tall body suggests.
Compare specific generations
Belgian taxes & LEZ