BMW X4 F26 vs Volkswagen T-Roc A11

BMW X4
F26 · 2014 – 2018
The first-generation X4 (F26), on the F25 X3 platform.

Volkswagen T-Roc
A11 · 2017 – 2025
The first-generation T-Roc (A11), on the MQB A1 platform.
BMW X4
Pick the F26 only with documented N20 chain work or a later build — otherwise the timing-chain risk is real.
Volkswagen T-Roc
Pick the T-Roc for a bold crossover look with an elevated seat and city-friendly dimensions.
Performance
xDrive28i · Petrol vs 1.5 TSI 150 · Petrol
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
245 hp
Winner
|
150 hp
|
| Torque |
350 Nm
Winner
|
250 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
6,4 s
Winner
|
8,5 s
|
| Top speed |
232 km/h
Winner
|
205 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
136,5 hp/t
Winner
|
118,6 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
179 g/km
|
128 g/km
Winner
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
7,2 L/100km
|
5,6 L/100km
Winner
|
Dimensions & space
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
500 L
Winner
|
445 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.400 L
Winner
|
1.290 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,81 m
Winner
|
2,59 m
|
| Length |
4,67 m
|
4,23 m
|
| Ground clearance |
20,0 cm
|
16,1 cm
|
| Turning circle |
11,9 m
|
10,9 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
Winner
|
1.800 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | F25 (F26, xDrive) | MQB A1 (transverse) |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive · All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | N20/N55 petrol · N47/B47 · N57 diesel | EA211 1.0/1.5 TSI · EA888 2.0 TSI (R) · EA288 1.6/2.0 TDI |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed manual · 7-speed DSG |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Euro standard | Euro 6 | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- N20 timing chain and tensioner (biggest risk)
- Electric water pump and coolant loss
- Oil-filter housing and valve-cover leaks
- Electronic parking-brake and software recalls (pre-facelift)
- Infotainment glitches on early cars
- Cabriolet: roof mechanism/water ingress at high mileage
Pros
- First X4: more aggressive style than the X3 F25
- N55 (35i) is the reliable petrol choice
- B47 diesel (20d/25d) much improved over N47
- Customisable design with optional contrasting roof
- Facelift (2022) brought modernised lights and interior
- Strong driver-assistance suite (IQ.DRIVE)
Cons
- N20 cold-start chain rattle is a warning sign
- Sloping roof limits rear headroom
- Pre-facelift interior (2017–2021) looks simpler
- Cabriolet: smaller boot and higher weight
Driving experience
BMW X4
More dynamic than a standard X3 of the same generation. Steering is accurate and reasonably weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but not a pure sports car — weight and the higher centre of gravity are noticeable when pushed. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) helps balance firmness and comfort. The N55 petrol sixes (35i/M40i) deliver strong, linear performance and a characterful engine note. The N20 four-cylinder petrols are competent but less refined. Diesels (especially the N57 sixes) offer strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that prioritises road presence and dynamics over maximum practicality.
Volkswagen T-Roc
Easy, comfortable and a little more involving than most crossovers. The T-Roc steers accurately with decent weighting, rides well enough, and handles tidily for a car of its height, with the 2.0 TSI R version adding genuine pace. Front-drive is the default; 4MOTION adds traction in poor conditions. The 1.5 TSI is the sensible pick — smooth and efficient — the 2.0 TDI is the distance choice, and the 1.0 TSI is adequate for town work. The DSG is smooth; the manual is light. It is a well-rounded compact crossover that feels closer to a Golf than its tall body suggests.
Belgian taxes & LEZ