BMW X4 G02 vs Volkswagen T-Roc A11

BMW X4
G02 · 2018 – 2026
The second-generation X4 (G02), on the CLAR platform shared with the X3 G01.

Volkswagen T-Roc
A11 · 2017 – 2025
The first-generation T-Roc (A11), on the MQB A1 platform.
BMW X4
Pick the G02 for the B58 M40i and a more dynamic, refined package than the F26.
Volkswagen T-Roc
Pick the T-Roc for a bold crossover look with an elevated seat and city-friendly dimensions.
Performance
M40i · Petrol vs 1.5 TSI 150 · Petrol
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
360 hp
Winner
|
150 hp
|
| Torque |
500 Nm
Winner
|
250 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
4,8 s
Winner
|
8,5 s
|
| Top speed |
250 km/h
Winner
|
205 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
188,0 hp/t
Winner
|
118,6 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
191 g/km
|
128 g/km
Winner
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
8,2 L/100km
|
5,6 L/100km
Winner
|
Dimensions & space
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
525 L
Winner
|
445 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.430 L
Winner
|
1.290 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,86 m
Winner
|
2,59 m
|
| Length |
4,75 m
|
4,23 m
|
| Ground clearance |
20,0 cm
|
16,1 cm
|
| Turning circle |
12,1 m
|
10,9 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
Winner
|
1.800 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | CLAR (G02, xDrive) | MQB A1 (transverse) |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive · All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | B48/B58 petrol · B47/B57 diesel (mild-hybrid) | EA211 1.0/1.5 TSI · EA888 2.0 TSI (R) · EA288 1.6/2.0 TDI |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed manual · 7-speed DSG |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Euro standard | Euro 6d | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- Cooling-system plastics and water pumps
- Oil-filter housing gasket leaks (B48/B58)
- EGR/DPF/AdBlue attention on diesels
- Electronic parking-brake and software recalls (pre-facelift)
- Infotainment glitches on early cars
- Cabriolet: roof mechanism/water ingress at high mileage
Pros
- B58 M40i is strong, free-revving and the standout
- Facelift (2021) brought mild-hybrid tech on many diesels
- More dynamic and refined than the F26
- Customisable design with optional contrasting roof
- Facelift (2022) brought modernised lights and interior
- Strong driver-assistance suite (IQ.DRIVE)
Cons
- Sloping roof reduces rear headroom versus the X3
- Firm ride on M Sport adaptive suspension and larger wheels
- Pre-facelift interior (2017–2021) looks simpler
- Cabriolet: smaller boot and higher weight
Driving experience
BMW X4
More dynamic and refined than the F26. Steering is accurate and well-weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but prioritises composure and refinement over pure sharpness. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) offers a useful range between firm and acceptable comfort. The B58 M40i is the standout: strong, refined, free-revving and characterful with excellent mid-range punch. B48 four-cylinder petrols are smooth and responsive. Diesels (especially the B57 sixes) deliver strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that balances road presence, dynamics and everyday usability better than its predecessor.
Volkswagen T-Roc
Easy, comfortable and a little more involving than most crossovers. The T-Roc steers accurately with decent weighting, rides well enough, and handles tidily for a car of its height, with the 2.0 TSI R version adding genuine pace. Front-drive is the default; 4MOTION adds traction in poor conditions. The 1.5 TSI is the sensible pick — smooth and efficient — the 2.0 TDI is the distance choice, and the 1.0 TSI is adequate for town work. The DSG is smooth; the manual is light. It is a well-rounded compact crossover that feels closer to a Golf than its tall body suggests.
Belgian taxes & LEZ