BMW X4 G02 vs Volkswagen T-Cross C11

BMW X4
G02 · 2018 – 2026
The second-generation X4 (G02), on the CLAR platform shared with the X3 G01.

Volkswagen T-Cross
C11 · 2019 – 2026
The first-generation T-Cross (C11), on the MQB A0 platform.
BMW X4
Pick the G02 for the B58 M40i and a more dynamic, refined package than the F26.
Volkswagen T-Cross
Pick the T-Cross for an agile urban SUV with a high seat, clever interior packaging and low running costs.
Performance
M40i · Petrol vs 1.0 TSI 115 · Petrol
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
360 hp
Winner
|
115 hp
|
| Torque |
500 Nm
Winner
|
200 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
4,8 s
Winner
|
10,0 s
|
| Top speed |
250 km/h
Winner
|
193 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
188,0 hp/t
Winner
|
96,6 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
191 g/km
|
120 g/km
Winner
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
8,2 L/100km
|
5,3 L/100km
Winner
|
Dimensions & space
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
525 L
Winner
|
455 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.430 L
Winner
|
1.281 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,86 m
Winner
|
2,55 m
|
| Length |
4,75 m
|
4,14 m
|
| Ground clearance |
20,0 cm
|
16,0 cm
|
| Turning circle |
12,1 m
|
10,6 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
Winner
|
1.100 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | CLAR (G02, xDrive) | MQB A0 (transverse) |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Engine family | B48/B58 petrol · B47/B57 diesel (mild-hybrid) | EA211 1.0/1.5 TSI · EA288 1.6 TDI |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed manual · 7-speed DSG |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Euro standard | Euro 6d | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- Cooling-system plastics and water pumps
- Oil-filter housing gasket leaks (B48/B58)
- EGR/DPF/AdBlue attention on diesels
- DQ200 DSG shift quality (dry clutch)
- Timing belt + water pump (EA211)
- Infotainment glitches on early cars
Pros
- B58 M40i is strong, free-revving and the standout
- Facelift (2021) brought mild-hybrid tech on many diesels
- More dynamic and refined than the F26
- Sliding rear bench (385–455 l boot)
- High seating position and good visibility
- Facelift (2024+) brought LED lighting and a nicer cabin
Cons
- Sloping roof reduces rear headroom versus the X3
- Firm ride on M Sport adaptive suspension and larger wheels
- Rear bench tight for three adults
- Pre-facelift interior plainer
Driving experience
BMW X4
More dynamic and refined than the F26. Steering is accurate and well-weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but prioritises composure and refinement over pure sharpness. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) offers a useful range between firm and acceptable comfort. The B58 M40i is the standout: strong, refined, free-revving and characterful with excellent mid-range punch. B48 four-cylinder petrols are smooth and responsive. Diesels (especially the B57 sixes) deliver strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that balances road presence, dynamics and everyday usability better than its predecessor.
Volkswagen T-Cross
Light, easy and built for town driving. The T-Cross steers quickly and lightly, rides acceptably, and is easy to park and place in traffic. It is front-wheel drive only, which suits its city role. The 1.0 TSI is the sensible choice — smooth and economical — the 1.5 TSI adds useful pace, and the DSG is smooth once moving. Body control is fine for a small crossover. It prioritises space, visibility and ease of use over any driving involvement.
Belgian taxes & LEZ