Audi Q6 e-tron GF vs BMW X4 G02

Audi Q6 e-tron
GF · 2024 – 2026
The first-generation Q6 e-tron (GF), on the PPE 800V platform.

BMW X4
G02 · 2018 – 2026
The second-generation X4 (G02), on the CLAR platform shared with the X3 G01.
Audi Q6 e-tron
Pick the GF for the 270 kW DC charging and the performance RWD’s ~625 km WLTP — ideally the quattro with the larger battery.
BMW X4
Pick the G02 for the B58 M40i and a more dynamic, refined package than the F26.
Performance
quattro · Electric vs M40i · Petrol
| Audi Q6 e-tron | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
388 hp
Winner
|
360 hp
|
| Torque |
855 Nm
Winner
|
500 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
5,9 s
|
4,8 s
Winner
|
| Top speed |
210 km/h
|
250 km/h
Winner
|
| Power-to-weight |
165,1 hp/t
|
188,0 hp/t
Winner
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
0 g/km
Winner
|
191 g/km
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
—
|
8,2 L/100km
|
Dimensions & space
| Audi Q6 e-tron | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
526 L
Winner
|
525 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.529 L
Winner
|
1.430 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,90 m
Winner
|
2,86 m
|
| Length |
4,77 m
|
4,75 m
|
| Ground clearance |
17,6 cm
|
20,0 cm
|
| Turning circle |
12,1 m
|
12,1 m
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
|
2.000 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| Audi Q6 e-tron | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | PPE (800-volt) | CLAR (G02, xDrive) |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive · All-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | Electric motors · RWD / quattro (PPE 800V) | B48/B58 petrol · B47/B57 diesel (mild-hybrid) |
| Transmission | Single-speed automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Fuel | Electric | Petrol |
| Euro standard | N/A (electric) | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- Software/electronics gremlins on early 2024 cars
- Long-term battery & drivetrain data still limited
- PPE 800V system: high-voltage check recommended
- Cooling-system plastics and water pumps
- Oil-filter housing gasket leaks (B48/B58)
- EGR/DPF/AdBlue attention on diesels
Pros
- 270 kW DC fast charging (10–80% in ~21 min)
- Performance RWD does up to ~625 km WLTP
- SQ6 e-tron has 489 hp (up to 517 hp in boost mode)
- B58 M40i is strong, free-revving and the standout
- Facelift (2021) brought mild-hybrid tech on many diesels
- More dynamic and refined than the F26
Cons
- SQ6 e-tron (489 hp, up to 517 hp in boost mode) cuts range to ~598 km WLTP
- Early software quirks
- Sloping roof reduces rear headroom versus the X3
- Firm ride on M Sport adaptive suspension and larger wheels
Driving experience
Audi Q6 e-tron
Quiet, quick and far more efficient than the old e-tron. The Q6 rides comfortably, steers accurately with decent weighting, and feels more agile and lighter on its feet than the GE, helped by the newer PPE platform. Rear-drive is the base; dual-motor quattro adds pace and all-wheel traction. The 800-volt architecture charges far faster on suitable chargers, and the larger battery delivers competitive real-world range. It is a more modern, more rounded electric SUV than the e-tron, with the same hushed refinement and without the efficiency penalty of the early car.
BMW X4
More dynamic and refined than the F26. Steering is accurate and well-weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but prioritises composure and refinement over pure sharpness. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) offers a useful range between firm and acceptable comfort. The B58 M40i is the standout: strong, refined, free-revving and characterful with excellent mid-range punch. B48 four-cylinder petrols are smooth and responsive. Diesels (especially the B57 sixes) deliver strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that balances road presence, dynamics and everyday usability better than its predecessor.
Belgian taxes & LEZ