Audi Q6 e-tron GF vs BMW X4 F26

Audi Q6 e-tron
GF · 2024 – 2026
The first-generation Q6 e-tron (GF), on the PPE 800V platform.

BMW X4
F26 · 2014 – 2018
The first-generation X4 (F26), on the F25 X3 platform.
Audi Q6 e-tron
Pick the GF for the 270 kW DC charging and the performance RWD’s ~625 km WLTP — ideally the quattro with the larger battery.
BMW X4
Pick the F26 only with documented N20 chain work or a later build — otherwise the timing-chain risk is real.
Performance
quattro · Electric vs xDrive28i · Petrol
| Audi Q6 e-tron | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
388 hp
Winner
|
245 hp
|
| Torque |
855 Nm
Winner
|
350 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
5,9 s
Winner
|
6,4 s
|
| Top speed |
210 km/h
|
232 km/h
Winner
|
| Power-to-weight |
165,1 hp/t
Winner
|
136,5 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
0 g/km
Winner
|
179 g/km
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
—
|
7,2 L/100km
|
Dimensions & space
| Audi Q6 e-tron | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
526 L
Winner
|
500 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.529 L
Winner
|
1.400 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,90 m
Winner
|
2,81 m
|
| Length |
4,77 m
|
4,67 m
|
| Ground clearance |
17,6 cm
|
20,0 cm
|
| Turning circle |
12,1 m
|
11,9 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
|
2.000 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| Audi Q6 e-tron | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | PPE (800-volt) | F25 (F26, xDrive) |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive · All-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | Electric motors · RWD / quattro (PPE 800V) | N20/N55 petrol · N47/B47 · N57 diesel |
| Transmission | Single-speed automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Fuel | Electric | Petrol |
| Euro standard | N/A (electric) | Euro 6 |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- Software/electronics gremlins on early 2024 cars
- Long-term battery & drivetrain data still limited
- PPE 800V system: high-voltage check recommended
- N20 timing chain and tensioner (biggest risk)
- Electric water pump and coolant loss
- Oil-filter housing and valve-cover leaks
Pros
- 270 kW DC fast charging (10–80% in ~21 min)
- Performance RWD does up to ~625 km WLTP
- SQ6 e-tron has 489 hp (up to 517 hp in boost mode)
- First X4: more aggressive style than the X3 F25
- N55 (35i) is the reliable petrol choice
- B47 diesel (20d/25d) much improved over N47
Cons
- SQ6 e-tron (489 hp, up to 517 hp in boost mode) cuts range to ~598 km WLTP
- Early software quirks
- N20 cold-start chain rattle is a warning sign
- Sloping roof limits rear headroom
Driving experience
Audi Q6 e-tron
Quiet, quick and far more efficient than the old e-tron. The Q6 rides comfortably, steers accurately with decent weighting, and feels more agile and lighter on its feet than the GE, helped by the newer PPE platform. Rear-drive is the base; dual-motor quattro adds pace and all-wheel traction. The 800-volt architecture charges far faster on suitable chargers, and the larger battery delivers competitive real-world range. It is a more modern, more rounded electric SUV than the e-tron, with the same hushed refinement and without the efficiency penalty of the early car.
BMW X4
More dynamic than a standard X3 of the same generation. Steering is accurate and reasonably weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but not a pure sports car — weight and the higher centre of gravity are noticeable when pushed. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) helps balance firmness and comfort. The N55 petrol sixes (35i/M40i) deliver strong, linear performance and a characterful engine note. The N20 four-cylinder petrols are competent but less refined. Diesels (especially the N57 sixes) offer strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that prioritises road presence and dynamics over maximum practicality.
Belgian taxes & LEZ