Audi Q3 F3 vs BMW X4 F26

Audi Q3
F3 · 2018 – 2025
The second-generation Q3 (F3), on the MQB A2 platform.

BMW X4
F26 · 2014 – 2018
The first-generation X4 (F26), on the F25 X3 platform.
Audi Q3
Pick the F3 for the roomy, tech-rich Q3 with the Virtual Cockpit and the smooth 1.5 TFSI — ideally a full-history example.
BMW X4
Pick the F26 only with documented N20 chain work or a later build — otherwise the timing-chain risk is real.
Performance
EA211 35 TFSI · Petrol vs xDrive28i · Petrol
| Audi Q3 | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
150 hp
|
245 hp
Winner
|
| Torque |
250 Nm
|
350 Nm
Winner
|
| 0–100 km/h |
9,2 s
|
6,4 s
Winner
|
| Top speed |
205 km/h
|
232 km/h
Winner
|
| Power-to-weight |
101,7 hp/t
|
136,5 hp/t
Winner
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
143 g/km
Winner
|
179 g/km
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
5,7 L/100km
Winner
|
7,2 L/100km
|
Dimensions & space
| Audi Q3 | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
530 L
Winner
|
500 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.525 L
Winner
|
1.400 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,68 m
|
2,81 m
Winner
|
| Length |
4,50 m
|
4,67 m
|
| Ground clearance |
17,0 cm
|
20,0 cm
|
| Turning circle |
11,8 m
Winner
|
11,9 m
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
|
2.000 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| Audi Q3 | BMW X4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | MQB A2 (transverse) | F25 (F26, xDrive) |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive · All-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | EA211 evo 1.5 TFSI · EA888 2.0 TFSI · EA288 2.0 TDI · 45 TFSI e PHEV | N20/N55 petrol · N47/B47 · N57 diesel |
| Transmission | S tronic (DSG) | 8-speed automatic |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Euro standard | Euro 6d-TEMP | Euro 6 |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- Infotainment software bugs on early cars
- DQ200 (7-speed dry DSG): mechatronics and clutch judder on early cars
- DPF/AdBlue on diesels with mainly short trips
- N20 timing chain and tensioner (biggest risk)
- Electric water pump and coolant loss
- Oil-filter housing and valve-cover leaks
Pros
- Roomy interior & big boot
- Modern tech (Virtual Cockpit)
- Modular EA engines
- First X4: more aggressive style than the X3 F25
- N55 (35i) is the reliable petrol choice
- B47 diesel (20d/25d) much improved over N47
Cons
- Firm ride on S line
- Some hard plastics
- N20 cold-start chain rattle is a warning sign
- Sloping roof limits rear headroom
Driving experience
Audi Q3
Comfortable, quiet and easy to place. The Q3 rides well over poor surfaces, stays settled at motorway speed, and steers accurately with light, consistent weighting. 2.0-litre cars use quattro, which adds strong traction in wet conditions and inspires confidence. The 1.5 TFSI is adequate but nothing more; the 45 TFSI is genuinely quick; the 2.0 TDI is the best all-rounder — torquey, economical and smooth at a cruise. The S tronic is sharp around town. Body control is good for a high-riding SUV, though the Q3 is set up for comfort rather than driver involvement.
BMW X4
More dynamic than a standard X3 of the same generation. Steering is accurate and reasonably weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but not a pure sports car — weight and the higher centre of gravity are noticeable when pushed. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) helps balance firmness and comfort. The N55 petrol sixes (35i/M40i) deliver strong, linear performance and a characterful engine note. The N20 four-cylinder petrols are competent but less refined. Diesels (especially the N57 sixes) offer strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that prioritises road presence and dynamics over maximum practicality.
Belgian taxes & LEZ