BMW X4 F26 vs Volkswagen T-Cross C11

BMW X4
F26 · 2014 – 2018
The first-generation X4 (F26), on the F25 X3 platform.

Volkswagen T-Cross
C11 · 2019 – 2026
The first-generation T-Cross (C11), on the MQB A0 platform.
BMW X4
Pick the F26 only with documented N20 chain work or a later build — otherwise the timing-chain risk is real.
Volkswagen T-Cross
Pick the T-Cross for an agile urban SUV with a high seat, clever interior packaging and low running costs.
Performance
xDrive28i · Petrol vs 1.0 TSI 115 · Petrol
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
245 hp
Winner
|
115 hp
|
| Torque |
350 Nm
Winner
|
200 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
6,4 s
Winner
|
10,0 s
|
| Top speed |
232 km/h
Winner
|
193 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
136,5 hp/t
Winner
|
96,6 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
179 g/km
|
120 g/km
Winner
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
7,2 L/100km
|
5,3 L/100km
Winner
|
Dimensions & space
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
500 L
Winner
|
455 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.400 L
Winner
|
1.281 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,81 m
Winner
|
2,55 m
|
| Length |
4,67 m
|
4,14 m
|
| Ground clearance |
20,0 cm
|
16,0 cm
|
| Turning circle |
11,9 m
|
10,6 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
Winner
|
1.100 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen T-Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | F25 (F26, xDrive) | MQB A0 (transverse) |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Engine family | N20/N55 petrol · N47/B47 · N57 diesel | EA211 1.0/1.5 TSI · EA288 1.6 TDI |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed manual · 7-speed DSG |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Euro standard | Euro 6 | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- N20 timing chain and tensioner (biggest risk)
- Electric water pump and coolant loss
- Oil-filter housing and valve-cover leaks
- DQ200 DSG shift quality (dry clutch)
- Timing belt + water pump (EA211)
- Infotainment glitches on early cars
Pros
- First X4: more aggressive style than the X3 F25
- N55 (35i) is the reliable petrol choice
- B47 diesel (20d/25d) much improved over N47
- Sliding rear bench (385–455 l boot)
- High seating position and good visibility
- Facelift (2024+) brought LED lighting and a nicer cabin
Cons
- N20 cold-start chain rattle is a warning sign
- Sloping roof limits rear headroom
- Rear bench tight for three adults
- Pre-facelift interior plainer
Driving experience
BMW X4
More dynamic than a standard X3 of the same generation. Steering is accurate and reasonably weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but not a pure sports car — weight and the higher centre of gravity are noticeable when pushed. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) helps balance firmness and comfort. The N55 petrol sixes (35i/M40i) deliver strong, linear performance and a characterful engine note. The N20 four-cylinder petrols are competent but less refined. Diesels (especially the N57 sixes) offer strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that prioritises road presence and dynamics over maximum practicality.
Volkswagen T-Cross
Light, easy and built for town driving. The T-Cross steers quickly and lightly, rides acceptably, and is easy to park and place in traffic. It is front-wheel drive only, which suits its city role. The 1.0 TSI is the sensible choice — smooth and economical — the 1.5 TSI adds useful pace, and the DSG is smooth once moving. Body control is fine for a small crossover. It prioritises space, visibility and ease of use over any driving involvement.
Belgian taxes & LEZ