BMW X1 E84 vs Volkswagen T-Roc A11

BMW X1
E84 · 2009 – 2015
The first-generation X1 (E84), rear-wheel-drive based.

Volkswagen T-Roc
A11 · 2017 – 2025
The first-generation T-Roc (A11), on the MQB A1 platform.
BMW X1
Pick the X1 for sharp BMW handling with a raised driving position and proven engines.
Volkswagen T-Roc
Pick the T-Roc for a bold crossover look with an elevated seat and city-friendly dimensions.
Performance
N20 20i · Petrol vs 1.5 TSI 150 · Petrol
| BMW X1 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
184 hp
Winner
|
150 hp
|
| Torque |
270 Nm
Winner
|
250 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
7,7 s
Winner
|
8,5 s
|
| Top speed |
205 km/h
|
205 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
121,1 hp/t
Winner
|
118,6 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
168 g/km
|
128 g/km
Winner
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
6,7 L/100km
|
5,6 L/100km
Winner
|
Dimensions & space
| BMW X1 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
420 L
|
445 L
Winner
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.350 L
Winner
|
1.290 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,76 m
Winner
|
2,59 m
|
| Length |
4,45 m
|
4,23 m
|
| Ground clearance |
18,3 cm
|
16,1 cm
|
| Turning circle |
11,8 m
|
10,9 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
1.800 kg
|
1.800 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| BMW X1 | Volkswagen T-Roc | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | E84 (E90 3 Series base, rear-wheel drive) | MQB A1 (transverse) |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive · All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive · All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | N20 2.0 petrol · N47 2.0 diesel · N55 3.0 (xDrive35i) | EA211 1.0/1.5 TSI · EA888 2.0 TSI (R) · EA288 1.6/2.0 TDI |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed manual · 7-speed DSG |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Euro standard | Euro 5 | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- N47 timing chain (pre-2011)
- Transfer case (xDrive)
- Cooling system needs checking
- Electronic parking-brake and software recalls (pre-facelift)
- Infotainment glitches on early cars
- Cabriolet: roof mechanism/water ingress at high mileage
Pros
- Handling thanks to rear-wheel drive
- Compact footprint
- Good headroom
- Customisable design with optional contrasting roof
- Facelift (2022) brought modernised lights and interior
- Strong driver-assistance suite (IQ.DRIVE)
Cons
- Firm ride
- Small boot for the class
- Pre-facelift interior (2017–2021) looks simpler
- Cabriolet: smaller boot and higher weight
Driving experience
BMW X1
—
Volkswagen T-Roc
Easy, comfortable and a little more involving than most crossovers. The T-Roc steers accurately with decent weighting, rides well enough, and handles tidily for a car of its height, with the 2.0 TSI R version adding genuine pace. Front-drive is the default; 4MOTION adds traction in poor conditions. The 1.5 TSI is the sensible pick — smooth and efficient — the 2.0 TDI is the distance choice, and the 1.0 TSI is adequate for town work. The DSG is smooth; the manual is light. It is a well-rounded compact crossover that feels closer to a Golf than its tall body suggests.
Belgian taxes & LEZ