Audi Q6 e-tron GF vs Renault Kadjar KAD

Audi Q6 e-tron
GF · 2024 – 2026
The first-generation Q6 e-tron (GF), on the PPE 800V platform.

Renault Kadjar
KAD · 2015 – 2022
The Kadjar (KAD), a compact SUV on the CMF-CD platform.
Audi Q6 e-tron
Pick the GF for the modern Q6 e-tron with 800-volt fast charging, long range and the digital cockpit — ideally the quattro with the larger battery.
Renault Kadjar
Pick the Kadjar for a roomy, comfortable compact SUV with an affordable used supply.
Performance
quattro · Electric vs 1.3 TCe 140 · Petrol
| Audi Q6 e-tron | Renault Kadjar | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
388 hp
Winner
|
140 hp
|
| Torque |
855 Nm
Winner
|
240 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
5,9 s
Winner
|
9,6 s
|
| Top speed |
210 km/h
Winner
|
205 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
165,1 hp/t
Winner
|
100,0 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
0 g/km
Winner
|
125 g/km
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
—
|
5,6 L/100km
|
Dimensions & space
| Audi Q6 e-tron | Renault Kadjar | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
526 L
Winner
|
472 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.529 L
Winner
|
1.478 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,90 m
Winner
|
2,65 m
|
| Length |
4,77 m
|
4,45 m
|
| Ground clearance |
17,6 cm
|
—
|
| Turning circle |
12,1 m
|
10,9 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
Winner
|
1.500 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| Audi Q6 e-tron | Renault Kadjar | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | PPE (800-volt) | CMF-CD |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive · All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive · All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | Electric motors · RWD / quattro (PPE 800V) | 1.2 TCe · 1.3 TCe · 1.6 TCe · 1.5 dCi/Blue dCi · 1.6 dCi · 1.7 Blue dCi |
| Transmission | Single-speed automatic | 6-speed manual · EDC7 |
| Fuel | Electric | Petrol |
| Euro standard | N/A (electric) | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- Software/electronics gremlins on early 2024 cars
- Long-term battery & drivetrain data still limited
- PPE 800V system: high-voltage check recommended
- 1.2 TCe: timing chain and oil consumption
- EDC/X-tronic: juddery at low speed
- Electrical gremlins and R-Link freezes
Pros
- 800-volt fast charging
- Competitive range (larger battery)
- Modern digital cockpit
- Roomy boot and comfortable ride
- Affordable and plentiful used
- Efficient 1.5 dCi diesel
Cons
- Limited long-term reliability data
- Early software quirks
- 1.2 TCe (early years) carries chain risk
- Interior less modern than newer rivals
Driving experience
Audi Q6 e-tron
Quiet, quick and far more efficient than the old e-tron. The Q6 rides comfortably, steers accurately with decent weighting, and feels more agile and lighter on its feet than the GE, helped by the newer PPE platform. Rear-drive is the base; dual-motor quattro adds pace and all-wheel traction. The 800-volt architecture charges far faster on suitable chargers, and the larger battery delivers competitive real-world range. It is a more modern, more rounded electric SUV than the e-tron, with the same hushed refinement and without the efficiency penalty of the early car.
Renault Kadjar
A relaxed long-distance cruiser rather than a dynamic driver's car. Steering is light and accurate enough for daily use, ride quality is generally compliant on smaller wheels and becomes firmer on 19-inch alloys, and body control is adequate. The 1.3 TCe feels responsive once moving, while the diesels are refined and strong for motorway use. The EDC dual-clutch is smooth at higher speeds but can show low-speed hesitation or judder, especially on early cars and in town. AWD versions add a modest amount of traction in slippery conditions.
Belgian taxes & LEZ