BMW X4 F26 vs Volkswagen Taigo CS1

BMW X4
F26 · 2014 – 2018
The first-generation X4 (F26), on the F25 X3 platform.

Volkswagen Taigo
CS1 · 2021 – 2026
The first-generation Taigo (CS1), on the MQB A0 platform.
BMW X4
Pick the F26 only with documented N20 chain work or a later build — otherwise the timing-chain risk is real.
Volkswagen Taigo
Pick the Taigo for a stylish coupé crossover with low running costs and city-friendly dimensions.
Performance
xDrive28i · Petrol vs 1.0 TSI 110 · Petrol
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen Taigo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
245 hp
Winner
|
110 hp
|
| Torque |
350 Nm
Winner
|
200 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
6,4 s
Winner
|
10,5 s
|
| Top speed |
232 km/h
Winner
|
191 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
136,5 hp/t
Winner
|
93,6 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
179 g/km
|
123 g/km
Winner
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
7,2 L/100km
|
5,4 L/100km
Winner
|
Dimensions & space
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen Taigo | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
500 L
Winner
|
440 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.400 L
Winner
|
1.222 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,81 m
Winner
|
2,57 m
|
| Length |
4,67 m
|
4,27 m
|
| Ground clearance |
20,0 cm
|
16,0 cm
|
| Turning circle |
11,9 m
|
10,9 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
Winner
|
1.200 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| BMW X4 | Volkswagen Taigo | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | F25 (F26, xDrive) | MQB A0 (transverse) |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Engine family | N20/N55 petrol · N47/B47 · N57 diesel | EA211 1.0 TSI · EA211 Evo 1.5 TSI |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed manual · 7-speed DSG |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Euro standard | Euro 6 | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- N20 timing chain and tensioner (biggest risk)
- Electric water pump and coolant loss
- Oil-filter housing and valve-cover leaks
- Timing belt (wet belt) on some 1.0 TSI
- Plastic water pump/thermostat module
- Infotainment glitches (MIB3) on early cars
Pros
- First X4: more aggressive style than the X3 F25
- N55 (35i) is the reliable petrol choice
- B47 diesel (20d/25d) much improved over N47
- Coupé roofline sets it apart from the T-Cross
- Thrifty 1.0 TSI with low CO2 (Euro 6d)
- Generous standard kit (LED, digital cockpit)
Cons
- N20 cold-start chain rattle is a warning sign
- Sloping roof limits rear headroom
- Less rear headroom due to the sloping roof
- No diesel or all-wheel-drive options
Driving experience
BMW X4
More dynamic than a standard X3 of the same generation. Steering is accurate and reasonably weighted, body control is good, and the car feels planted and secure with xDrive. It is engaging for a crossover but not a pure sports car — weight and the higher centre of gravity are noticeable when pushed. Adaptive suspension (where fitted) helps balance firmness and comfort. The N55 petrol sixes (35i/M40i) deliver strong, linear performance and a characterful engine note. The N20 four-cylinder petrols are competent but less refined. Diesels (especially the N57 sixes) offer strong low-end torque and effortless cruising. Overall a stylish, capable crossover that prioritises road presence and dynamics over maximum practicality.
Volkswagen Taigo
Light, easy and aimed squarely at town driving. The Taigo steers quickly and lightly, rides acceptably, and slips through city streets with little effort. The sloping roofline looks good but trims rear headroom, and it is front-wheel drive only. The 1.0 TSI is the sensible choice — smooth and economical — the 1.5 TSI adds useful pace, and the DSG is smooth. It is a style-led small crossover that prioritises looks and ease of use over outright practicality or driving involvement.
Belgian taxes & LEZ