Audi Q3 F3 vs Renault Kadjar KAD

Audi Q3
F3 · 2018 – 2025
The second-generation Q3 (F3), on the MQB A2 platform.

Renault Kadjar
KAD · 2015 – 2022
The Kadjar (KAD), a compact SUV on the CMF-CD platform.
Audi Q3
Pick the Q3 for maximum interior space, a bigger boot and modern technology.
Renault Kadjar
Pick the Kadjar for a roomy, comfortable compact SUV with an affordable used supply.
Performance
EA211 35 TFSI · Petrol vs 1.3 TCe 140 · Petrol
| Audi Q3 | Renault Kadjar | |
|---|---|---|
| Power |
150 hp
Winner
|
140 hp
|
| Torque |
250 Nm
Winner
|
240 Nm
|
| 0–100 km/h |
9,2 s
Winner
|
9,6 s
|
| Top speed |
205 km/h
|
205 km/h
|
| Power-to-weight |
101,7 hp/t
Winner
|
100,0 hp/t
|
| CO₂ emissions (WLTP) |
143 g/km
|
125 g/km
Winner
|
| Consumption (WLTP) |
5,7 L/100km
|
5,6 L/100km
Winner
|
Dimensions & space
| Audi Q3 | Renault Kadjar | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot |
530 L
Winner
|
472 L
|
| Boot (seats folded) |
1.525 L
Winner
|
1.478 L
|
| Wheelbase |
2,68 m
Winner
|
2,65 m
|
| Length |
4,50 m
|
4,45 m
|
| Ground clearance |
17,0 cm
|
—
|
| Turning circle |
11,8 m
|
10,9 m
Winner
|
| Towing capacity (braked) |
2.000 kg
Winner
|
1.500 kg
|
Powertrain & tech
| Audi Q3 | Renault Kadjar | |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | MQB A2 (transverse) | CMF-CD |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive · All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive · All-wheel drive |
| Engine family | EA211 evo 1.5 TFSI · EA888 2.0 TFSI · EA288 2.0 TDI · 45 TFSI e PHEV | 1.2 TCe · 1.3 TCe · 1.6 TCe · 1.5 dCi/Blue dCi · 1.6 dCi · 1.7 Blue dCi |
| Transmission | S tronic (DSG) | 6-speed manual · EDC7 |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Euro standard | Euro 6d-TEMP | Euro 6d |
| LEZ access | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) | Unrestricted access (compliant under current legislation) |
Reliability & watch-outs
Known issues
- Infotainment software (early cars)
- S tronic service (DQ200 models)
- Cooling system/DPF (diesels) needs checking
- 1.2 TCe: timing chain and oil consumption
- EDC/X-tronic: juddery at low speed
- Electrical gremlins and R-Link freezes
Pros
- Roomy interior & big boot
- Modern tech (Virtual Cockpit)
- Modular EA engines
- Roomy boot and comfortable ride
- Affordable and plentiful used
- Efficient 1.5 dCi diesel
Cons
- Firm ride on S line
- Some hard plastics
- 1.2 TCe (early years) carries chain risk
- Interior less modern than newer rivals
Driving experience
Audi Q3
Comfortable, quiet and easy to place. The Q3 rides well over poor surfaces, stays settled at motorway speed, and steers accurately with light, consistent weighting. 2.0-litre cars use quattro, which adds strong traction in wet conditions and inspires confidence. The 1.5 TFSI is adequate but nothing more; the 45 TFSI is genuinely quick; the 2.0 TDI is the best all-rounder — torquey, economical and smooth at a cruise. The S tronic is sharp around town. Body control is good for a high-riding SUV, though the Q3 is set up for comfort rather than driver involvement.
Renault Kadjar
A relaxed long-distance cruiser rather than a dynamic driver's car. Steering is light and accurate enough for daily use, ride quality is generally compliant on smaller wheels and becomes firmer on 19-inch alloys, and body control is adequate. The 1.3 TCe feels responsive once moving, while the diesels are refined and strong for motorway use. The EDC dual-clutch is smooth at higher speeds but can show low-speed hesitation or judder, especially on early cars and in town. AWD versions add a modest amount of traction in slippery conditions.
Belgian taxes & LEZ